On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:08:48 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote:
> Liar.... You originally
> thought it to be nothing more than a 'syntax error'; and I'll be
> happy to provide the MID to your post, if you'd like to see it.
Hi Diesel,
I think I'm slowly, belatedly, beginning to better understand you now.
o I reported honestly that I was hoping I could figure out the syntax
o Then I reported honestly that I failed to get "net use" to work with FTP
You call that being a "liar".
I call it being honest.
It's interesting how you see those facts in a completely different way.
I need to study you more closely to comprehend _why_ you think that way.
> I bet Frank knows of more than one solution, actually.
The great thing about Frank Slootweg is that he explained to the folks who
never comprehended the problem set, what the problem set is.
Frank understands it as well or better than I do, but Frank has much better
skills at dropping down to the level of the hoi polloi than can I.
Frank's explanations of the problem set were far better than mine, I agree.
> Uhh, You've added NO value to this thread. You've pimped and prodded
> for others information concerning what you what to do with your
> Android device.
Hi Diesel,
I think I understand where you and I differ, having read what you've
written on this topic over the past few days.
You believe, apparently, that waving a mythical magical wand claiming all
sorts of capabilities is added value, while I believe that actual commands,
and their results, with annotated screenshots replete with URLs backing up
everything ... is the added value.
The difference, between your idea of value, and mine, is stellar:
o One is magical hand waving, while
o The other is cold hard reproducible facts.
No wonder you see no value in my posts.
o All my posts contained actual documented reproducible facts
o None of your posts contained any actual reproducible facts
Hence I agree with your supposition, Diesel, that we're polar opposites.
> They aren't imaginary, Frank's using one himself AND he didn't learn
> about it from me.
Hehhehheh... Hey Diesel ...
Do you want proof that Frank's so-called solution is entirely imaginary?
> Which goes to prove my previous point, Arlen. I'm
> not the only one who knows how to do what you'd like to do. I'm
> disinclined to acquiesce to your request. Means, "No"
Hi Diesel,
Thanks for being wholly consistent in letting me know, again, that you have
the answers, but that you won't tell me them, because, I think it was that
you said "you wanted to make me beg for them", is that right?
> I fully comprehend the problem you're having. The solutions I have
> aren't imaginary nor are they magical.
Hi Diesel,
You're consistent, so that's good as you also said, at another point in
time, that you always had all the answers, but you won't tell them,
because, as I recall, you "wanted to make us work for them", is that right?
> and I, for reasons you already know, have refused to provide YOU any
> specific information that will allow you to do what you've spent over
> a month now trying to figure out.
Hi Diesel,
I appreciate that you're consistent in that you know all the answers but
you won't tell them, because you want me to find them out for myself.
I appreciate the care you put into developing my skill set.
> And, I bet, despite Frank forking over general knowledge of one
> particular, reliable, way of doing it, you still won't be able to get
> it up and going without further assistance.
Hi Diesel,
Let's not forget that I think Frank has already begun to prove his
so-called claimed solution will turn out to be wholly imaginary.
We still have time though on that...as there is an entire thread on that
topic alone, where I'm sure the proof will be in the taste of the pudding.
I'm funny that way, Diesel.
o All my solutions actually exist (where I provide proof of what I say).
o They're not imaginary, like those of so many others appear to be.
> Ehh, For the record, the answer is Yes, but, you don't know what the
> name of the app would be, or where you might find it. You're far too
> arrogant to learn. I know this to be a fact.
Again, it's nice to know that only you know the answer to the question,
where, since you're so caring, you wont' tell anyone, unless they beg, and
even then, you want to make them work for it.
It's noble of you to be so consistently considerate (teach a man to fish).
Especially since I'm claiming that there are far too many wholly imaginary
magic-wand claims of solutions floating out there on the net - it's nice to
know you keep the very real world solutions you have tightly to yourself.
> There's no us. I'm not making anyone except for you, and you alone,
> work for it. I've been very clear about that, Arlen. There's no point
> in you trying to claim otherwise.
I appreciate this, Diesel, that you, alone, have the solution to the
problem that nobody else seems to have the solution to, and that you want
to make me beg and work for it.
I appreciate your kindness and concern for others Diesel.
It's endearing. I'm kind of beginning to really like you Diesel.
Because you care so much.
> Obviously not. Frank uses one of them. rofl.
Well, as I said, the proof is growing that Frank's solution will turn out
to be, yet again, wholly imaginary ... but let's see how the thread on that
very topic turns out before we claim that Frank just made it all up.
Even if Frank did wave his magic wand, I know you would never do that,
Diesel. I have faith in you that what you say is always fact.
> HAHAHAHAHA. You don't have a solution to your problem, yet. You
> cannot mount drive letters for android internal/external memory.
> Frank can. I can. But, you, cannot.
Hi Diesel,
It's nice to know that you feel my documented methods, with screenshots,
urls, references, results, etc., are not a solution.... while ....
It's just as nice to know, by way of contrast, that both you and Frank,
sans any need for such things as actual proof, already have the solution.
It's nice to know actually, since,
o You wont' tell me unless I beg, and,
o even then, you won't tell me - because I have to work for it.
What's nice is that you and Frank have such wonderful solutions that work
so much better than mine do, since mine are documented, and yours exist
only in your minds.
I guess I'll have to beg or work harder for it, or I won't get them, right?
> So you keep asking how to do it because?
Remember, we're seeking the universal solution.
o MTPDrive works pretty well over USB - but it's payware
o FTP shares over WiFi work pretty well
o WebDAV over WiFi works pretty well too
But we're always wanting to improve.
For example, the holy grail would be MTPDrive functionality using freeware.
I'm sure there is a way to do that - I just don't know what it is yet.
Of course, both you and Frank know what it is, but you won't tell us,
o We have to beg, and,
o Even then, you'll make us work for it.
Sigh.
I should never have upset you in the first place.
Mea culpa.
> A solution you'd like more specifics on, I'm sure. Because, it gives
> you exactly what you've been asking for, for well over a fucking
> month now.
Hi Diesel,
You're consistent at least, so it's nice to know you claim a solution that
works, but that nobody else on this planet knows what that solution is.
If I beg enough, and if I work hard enough for that solution, maybe then,
but only maybe, you'll tell me.
Boy ... I sure wish I hadn't upset you so much - otherwise you would have
told me how to get the MTP drive functionality over USB using freeware long
ago.
> Wrong again. I've specifically said I won't tell YOU. :)
Hi Diesel,
I think you've been consistent in that
o You know the answer that nobody else seems to know, and,
o You won't tell me because I haven't groveled enough, and,
o Even if I did, you won't tell me until I've worked hard enough for it.
Now I'm rally kicking myself in the pants for having pissed you off.
> Oh. Don't assume Frank is stupid, Arlen...I suspect Frank too has a
> general idea of you at this point. I'd go so far as to say he's known
> for a longer period of time than myself.
I agree with you that Frank only appears to be stupid, but that he's not
actually stupid, which is why, for example, he hasn't yet answered the
question of what his (magical?) method is for doing what he says I've
ignored all along.
Only if he was stupid would he actually come up with that mythical magical
method he seems to claim he has - since - well - since I'd test it of
course.
And, once I tested it, if it really was a mythical magical method, then,
well, then Frank would have egg on his face for always claiming
capabilities that he really does not have.
Now I know you would never do that, Diesel, in that you'd never claim you
had a method that works without that method actually existing like Frank
does ... but that Frank. He's different from you.
That's why you and I get along so well Diesel, compared to Frank.
> That was funny, have to admit. I owe pooh for the laugh. I really do.
I have to admit, Pooh sent me on a wild goose chase ... twice.
But I'm not sure if he meant to out of malice or just ignorance.
I don't know. I don't know Pooh well enough yet to know if he's smart, but
malicious, or less than smart and helpful but wrong all the time.
I dunno. I'll learn over time I guess.
> HEHEHEHE. What's it really worth to you, Arlen? Don't worry about
> ignoring my question. I've finally come to the realization that you
> have no interest in actually solving any of your problems.
Hi Diesel,
I'm glad you asked "what it's worth to me" to have the answer to the
question which boils down, basically, to getting MTPDrive capability on
Window with freeware.
I realize only you and Frank have the answer to that question, where I must
apologize that I angered both of you to the point that
o You won't give me the answer you had all along
o Because I haven't begged enough for that answer, and, worse,
o I haven't worked hard enough for that answer,
So, for now, as they told Admiral Bull Halsey in the ending snippet...
"The world wonders..."